By in Politics

"Hilary Clinton And The Private Email Scandal" "Is The Investigation Just?"

'Hilary Diane Rodham Clinton', former United States secretary of the state, and first lady of the forty second United States president 'Bill Clinton' served as the sixty seventh Secretary of the State underneath 'Barrack Obama' from 2009 until 2013. Throughout this four year term, Hilary was said to have been using 'private email servers' to send and receive information rather than secured departmental ones. Wide Spread Congressional investigations have determined that Hilary sent and or received 'Top Secret', 'classified' information in the form of emails across her private servers during her term as Secretary of State. Recently, 'Hilary Clinton' agreed to hand over her private email server to the 'Department of Justice' to be investigated for sensitive material after denying that she had not sent or received sensitive data across the private server, but before she handed it over, Hilary wiped almost 32,000 emails from the private account which she asserted were 'personal emails', not work related. Why did Hilary wipe almost 32,000 emails from her private email server just before handing it over to the Justice Department? Why did she choose to omit to Congress that she even had a private email server through her four year term? She used her private email account for public and private communication according to a recent CNN report. Should Hilary be further investigated or perhaps maybe summoned before the magistrates or even prosecuted? Is the investigation by the Department of Justice just, or is Hilary operating a private email server underneath government radar blown way out of proportion?--Whats your take?

Option Yes

2 votes / 66% 2 votes / 66 %

Option No

0 votes / 0% 0 votes


0 votes / 0% 0 votes

I need to do more research

1 votes / 33% 1 votes / 33 %
This poll has received 3 vote(s) so far.

You will need an account to comment - feel free to register or login.


MegL wrote on September 7, 2015, 6:28 AM

I reckon that Washington (and any other country's government) is full of corruption. They are all trying to point the finger. But as someone pointed out (!), when you point the finger at someone, the other four fingers are pointing straight back at you.

JohnRoberts wrote on September 7, 2015, 9:24 AM

Contrary to liberal beliefs, she isn't entitled to special treatment nor is it Republican conspiracy. If it was a Republican in her shoes, the libs and Dems would be all over it. If she is innocent or can't be nailed due to cover up, so be it and she can along her merry way.

DWDavisRSL wrote on September 7, 2015, 11:02 AM

As the person in question is a former Secretary of State and a possible future President, I think any question of just how lightly she takes national security must be addressed and cleared up for her sake as well as the country's.

LeaPea2417 wrote on December 12, 2015, 12:26 AM

Yes, it is a just investigation because she is a know liar who is not above the law. I fear for this country if she is elected the President of the United States.